Below is part of an article from the World Herald of Omaha, Nebraska by Jake Thompson approximately July 7, 2000 about Republican Senator: Chuck Hagel of Nebraska regarding the Republican Senator's Inflation wants and needs while he has political power for the balance of his six year term (like in term limits).

Below is a solution from an insurance company that I received regarding your social security benefit that the Senate and Congress have been knowingly turning its back on for the past 40 years. It is your benefit and you earned it and surly Senator Hagel of Nebraska and his friends (are not political insensitivity to the voter) would want to change or correct this (lagging behind the inflation curve) benefit -that you have been paying for- for inflation. You should not have to be paying twice for this benefit. You should only be paying once. Social Security payments that you have been paying all these years have been adjusted up for inflation, then, why has your senator and congressmen (women) not been adjusting for inflation the death benefit that is yours. Paying again to an insurance company is only big business controlling your Senator and Congressman (woman).

My letter to Republican Senator: Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.

** Waiting for Republican Senator Chuck Hagel's ,of Nebraska, written reply.
* * * * NOTHING AS OF THIS DATE (May 2, 2008) * * * * HE SHOULD LEAVE THE SENATE AS LIKE MOST OF THE SENATORS THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING IN 6 OR 12 YEARS (2 Terms).

Write them (your representative) about this benefit problem that needs to be adjusted for inflation by, CLICKING HERE TO FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE.

** Waiting for Republican Congressman Lee Terry's written reply.
* * * * NOTHING AS OF THIS DATE (May 2, 2008) * * * *

Write him (your representative) about this benefit problem that needs to be adjusted for inflation by, CLICKING HERE TO FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE.

HERE FOR AN EXAMPLE. WHY this benefit problem needs to be adjusted for inflation THIS IS SAD AFTER 15, 20, 30, 40, OR MORE YEARS OF PAYING INTO SOCIAL SECURITY....... WHAT DID YOUR POLITICIANS DO WHEN THEY MANAGED YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS? You reelected them, gave them hundreds of thousand of dollars for their misgivings.

SAD, SAD, :( ... When your love one dies in the middle of the month or near the beginning or end of the month your Senator and Congress individuals made sure that the decease person does not collect up untill the day of death .... Again your representatives are -with their vote- cheated you and your love one by helping themselves by pretending that the death occured the monthe before ..... sad sad (:~\ ............. your elected officials keep on short changing you the longer they are in Washington ............. Shorten their time in Washington before they short changing you.

* * * * Remember This is a benefit that "is yours" and has not been addressed by your President, Senate or Congress since 45 years ago. What makes you think George Bush and the others will treat you correctly and honestly with these Social Security changes when he couldn't correct the simplest "benefit" mentioned below first?

Bush wants to scare you and divert your attention from the Bush/Chaney War and if they can get away with it they will scare you out of your country's safety net "Social Security".

LOOK HERE TO SEE
how big your social security benefit payments are that you make every year. Ever since George Bush has been president he has squandered your social security payments on welfare to the farmers (big business farmers), tax breaks for the rich (who can afford to pay their own way), and he also gave away the next five years of your social security payments for the war in Iraq. - just look - to correct the problem you would have to vote out all of his friends in the next election when you go to vote.

REMEMBER THE MONEY YOU AND YOUR EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTE TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND barrel (not a personal fund for yourself because you may die before collecting from the social security fund) ... IS PRIMARILY FOR HOLDING the social fabric of American together - not for retirement ... your retirement is from your other investments i.e. the stock market and the company you worked for in the last 35 years like Enron, Atlantic Pacific grocery store, United Airlines etc. THE LIVING At A CERTAIN AGE needs social security the final safety net.

* * * * Remember your Senators and Congressmen (women) do not pay Social Security from their pay checks like you do .... so why should they care .... they are exempt .... hear them Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
......... SHOULD VOTERS STRONGLY CONSIDER TERM LIMITS. * * * *

* * * * Don't forget that a good war hero and or judge or leader of the Senate or Congress does not necessarily make those individuals a good elected official to represent you or the good of the future for you
......... SHOULD VOTERS STRONGLY CONSIDER TERM LIMITS . * * * *

* * * * History will write George's game plan as two fold; (1) Diversion from the Iraq Bush War (2) a Weapon of Mass Destruction -by attacking Social Security- there is only one PROBLEM FOR THE VOTER and it is in the White house code name (George)-- by trying to destroy your Social Security program.
Eliminating social security by George Bush is so that no one party can have a claim to social security's leadership in the future, so, it is important to Bush and his top harden party members get rid of the Social Security safety net. There is nothing for all the citizens of this country except Social Security.

. There is more than enough money in the U. S. Economy to support the benefits of Social Security without the Republican leadership destroying - including controlled spending by your Congress and Senate (which means term limits)
......... SHOULD VOTERS STRONGLY CONSIDER TERM LIMITS. * * * *

* * * * Remember; "the government (Senate, Congress) can hurt you, but, the constitution can not"

LOOK HERE ...
A NEW OFFER MADE TO ME WHICH MEANS NOTHING HAS BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OUR Congress / Senate.
OTHER than certain elected people in our Congress and Senate want to destroy your social sceurity ... Americans Safety Net to all ! !

* * * * Point of Interest; I watched Senator Ben Nelson -Nebraska- on the Senator floor late at night (when most of you Voters were a sleep) when the budget was being voted upon in December 2005. Ben voted against supporting the Troops by voting against Mental Health Care for the troops. As did many Republicans - Ben must have been a Republican that night. Ben could be hurting at least one Troop to thousands of troop in the War. "(Senate and Congress) can hurt you, but, the constitution can not"